Laughter as medicine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies evaluating the impact of spontaneous laughter on cortisol levels.

OBJECTIVES: Laughter as an expression of humor has been recognized as good medicine for centuries. The health benefits of humor-induced well-being remain unclear and thus we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies to evaluate the impact of spontaneous laughter on stress response as measured by cortisol levels. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Interventional studies, which could be either randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental studies, conducted in adults that compared any spontaneous laughter intervention to a controlled setting and reported changes in cortisol levels were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We examined the impact of laughter on percentage change in cortisol levels by calculating pooled estimates of the absolute differences between arithmetic means before and after interventions as compared to control using random-effects model. RESULTS: Eight studies (315 participants; mean age 38.6) met our inclusion criteria; four were RCTs and four were quasi-experiment studies. Five studies evaluated the impact of watching a humor/comedy video, two studies evaluating laughter sessions administered by a trained laughter therapist, and one study evaluating a self-administered laughter program. Pooling these data showed a significant reduction in cortisol levels by 31.9% (95%CI -47.7% to -16.3%) induced by laughter intervention compared to control group with no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.66). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that even a single laughter session induced a significant reduction of 36.7% in cortisol (95%CI -52.5% to -20.8%). In addition, analyses including the four RCTs reinforced these results by demonstrating a significant reduction in cortisol levels promoted by laughter as compared to the placebo arm [-37.2% (95%CI -56.3% to -18.1%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence demonstrates that spontaneous laughter is associated with greater reduction in cortisol levels as compared with usual activities, suggesting laughter as a potential adjunctive medical therapy to improve well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: CRD42021267972.

What is Known About Dietary Interventions and Body Weight Management After Kidney Transplantation? A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies report weight gain after kidney transplantation, which is commonly related to poor outcomes. However, recommendations for dietary interventions aiming to manage these patients' weight are still scarce in the literature. Thus, this review seeks to describe the state of literature on the effect of dietary interventions on weight after kidney transplantation. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: This review was designed according to the recommendations for scoping reviews elaborated by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Studies assessing the effect of dietary interventions on body weight after kidney transplantations were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases up to June 28, 2021. Two independent reviewers summarized the data collected. RESULTS: Thirteen (503 patients) of the 4.983 articles identified in the searched databases were included in our study. Most studies were published before 2010 and presented incomplete methodology descriptions. Nutritional counseling and dietary prescriptions according to the Step 1 diet of the American Heart Association (AHA) were the most common interventions. Only 2 studies evaluated changes in body weight as primary outcome. Three studies were randomized clinical trials (RCT), and none of these found the adopted interventions to demonstrate benefits. CONCLUSION: Our scoping review evinced a scarcity of data available in the literature addressing this topic. Most studies were not controlled and presented poor methodological quality. Moreover, these studies included small sample sizes, so that the assessment of dietary interventions in these patients still lacks power for definitive conclusions. Prospective RCT should be conducted to define effective in preventing weight gain or weight loss after kidney transplant.